Sta.sh
Since you are too much of a coward to allow me to dispute your lies, here is my response to your comment:Tickling is not a Fetish, and liking to engage in tickling minors is not perverted in the least. Any perversion you see is your own. The majority of people see nothing sexual about my stories; you are one of a tiny minority of freaks.
For one thing, I am totally asexual. NOTHING arouses me sexually, so how could I put any "perversion" in my stories? Frankly, I've seen more than a few people trying to rationalize their own sick desire to sexualize children by blaming something like a neutral story, but that's like saying that people who write about murders are murderers themselves, or like the idea of committing murders. That is a completely ludicrous thought, and so is your demented rationalization of your own perversion.
The statement I gave is very true. It takes a real paedo to see paedophilia in media where there is none, and no amount of lying to yourself is going to change the fact that it's all you; not my stories.
If you find sexualization in childhood stories where there are none, you should probably go see a psychologist, because you are one sick monkey! What's next? Are you going to call Harry Potter kiddie porn because the kids are all handling "wands"? That is just how ridiculous your assertion is.
RULES 
if you are interested in supporting me and helping me produce more content while getting special perks, please check my Patreon!:origin()/pre15/74cf/th/pre/f/2016/041/5/5/55e3873228cf7d5b147fafd956611d60-d9ra1gc.jpg)
:origin()/pre10/61b8/th/pre/f/2016/042/f/2/f2dc780538057f2a539329d97eb76a12-d9re5wn.jpg)
:origin()/pre02/4de7/th/pre/f/2016/089/9/e/1993_by_lopoddity-d9x4f0e.jpg)
:origin()/pre00/44ff/th/pre/f/2016/007/8/8/wb04_by_nebezial-d9n40zb.jpg)
:origin()/pre01/a40b/th/pre/f/2016/027/d/6/img_og_by_seoul_child-d9pk1qa.jpg)
Quite frankly, you are full of shit. Your entire gallery is devoted to the tickling of minors. Not the odd story here or there, or a random tickling scene, but the entirety of it. All your stories are based around the tickling of underaged characters. That raises legitimate questions of your motives. Pinning it back on people who point out the obvious is classical reverse psychology - supposedly I am the sick monkey yet you are writing stories of children in bondage situations? Laughably ironic. Tickling might not be a fetish in and of itself but it's most definitely a kink of yours, because you not only obsess about it but also administer other kinks (such as bondage). Gee I wonder if there's a link... hmm... I'll let other people decide on that one, but we know the answer!
You can say that it's my perversion all you want (that doesn't make any sense, considering the criticism is of your work), but I am not the one writing dozens of stories of minors being stripped of their clothes and touched inappropriately. This is simply a defensive mechanism from you to hide your true motives; to deflect blame when challenged. Your Harry Potter analogy makes no sense either; when people watch Harry Potter, they don't associate wands with penises. But when people see that you obsess over minors, bondage and tickling then that's a different matter entirely.
If you are so confident of your stories not having any ulterior motives, then why do you put in a disclaimer with almost every one of them? A little insecure about your position, perhaps? You're not kidding anyone expect your merry band of sick fucks who probably read your stories simply to fap to them. Why would the touching of little boys elicit attention otherwise? Your fabulous writing and storytelling? Give me a break. Most of us know that isn't true; because you're so one dimensional that all you write about is tickling minors. That's the only subject matter - logic tells us that you have an ulterior motive.
Hmm yes, put in jail. What laws did I break again? I am not the one writing stories of children in bondage situations getting touched... seems like you are far more likely to commit these crimes, my good sir. You are a walking parody of yourself, your reply here should be directed at yourself. You're the epitome of irony. Getting so self defensive that you are accusing others of perverted acts, whereas you're the one with the stories here. That definitely smacks of ulterior motives or a hidden agenda.
You aren't fooling anyone.
Your self-rationalization is getting tiresome. Accept that you're a minority and a pervert; the vast majority of my readers see it as what it is; fun, childhood games and the wholesome enjoyment of the innocent laughter of children.
Go crawl back under your rock with the rest of the slime.
Stop me from what? Calling you what you are?
Your stories also have an element of torture to them, yet I'm the pervert? Wow, you couldn't be more ironic and stupid if you tried.
Ah yes, that old sniff. "Writing about torture makes you a torturer". Bullshit. Steven King wrote a short story about boys being forced to go on an endless hike, with any who stopped being shot in the head. Are you going to say that Steven King is a sadist that supports shooting kids in the head?
Have you ever had a logical thought in your life? Have you ever had a thought that wasn't put in your head by a pervert?
Seriously, if you think touching children is perverted, then you are one sick monkey, and one of the contributors to the phenomenon of violent, out-of-control children. Experts say that tactile affection and discipline is an essential element of raising healthy children. Or are you going to claim that anyone who puts his hand on a child's shoulder to stop him from doing something wrong is a pervert? Seriously, go crawl back under your rock!
No, I am not saying that. You are using a strawman argument there. The difference between them and you is that relatives tickling their kids is spontaneous, used for moments of bonding. It's important to be physically bonding with your children, as long as it isn't excessive or done with a mindset intended to gratify your own pleasures. You on the other hand, dedicate a large amount of your time writing stories of tickling children, often in bondage situations. A parent or relative would not tie up their children to beds, or strip them almost naked to tickle torture them. So don't be comparing your stories to common, everyday situations.
I would say that King is a bit of a sadist, yes. Someone who will write so much of the same topic would clearly enjoy it, even if it's in a written and fictional form. Does he support it? No, but that's because it would sully his reputation. His books are there to appease the sadistically inclined, for people who like to get a fright. He knows this, I am sure.
I like how you stretch from the context of the current topic to one's entire life. How do you enjoy being irrelevant?
As I have already said, and let me spell it out for you so that you understand: c-o-n-t-e-x-t. Yes, I think stripping children to their underwear and restraining them is perverted. How does make me a sick monkey? That's quite hypocritical coming from someone who often writes about tickling in such a context. What the experts say isn't relevant here unless you can cite expert opinion of restraining a child and tickling them almost bare naked. I'm not sure what your last question has to do with anything, but rather than trying to deliberately misinterpreting me, stick with the topic.
You have a child tickling fetish, don't pretend otherwise. The signs are all there, and I don't need to be a "sick monkey" to say as such. Otherwise, every judge and jury are "sick monkeys" for calling a murderer a murderer. At a point, it gets so obvious when a spade is a spade, your strawman arguments, reverse psychology, and insecure disclaimers with every story doesn't change the facts.
Tickling isn't my entire life; once again, you've presumed wrong; likely driven by your sick perverse obsession. You see only a fragment of my life; I have writing projects beyond tickling; I just don't post them here.
There is no such thing as a child tickling fetish, and you're sick in the head for suggesting there is. You're just a paedophile who sees tickling children as erotic.
and while i DO agree with your artistic freedom claiming to not tie in with sexuality or fetishism, you SHOULD expect most of your fan base to be fetishists. you're right that ALL tickling and stories about minors are not fetishized, but it's kind of hard to argue when you have a lot of stories based around that. i havent read all of your stories, ill admit, but ive read a lot, and a lot of them are tickling. i also agree with what you say about how not all defecating is considered fetishized, but if you knew an author who wrote lots of stories about people taking dumps in great detail, you would kinda ask yourself some questions, wouldn't you?
Incidentally, Paedophilia is not a sexuality; it is a deviant mental state, and as thus, is open for all the bashing anyone might wish to inflict upon it.
Agatha Christie and Steven King are horror novelists whose novels contain brutal murders. I'm a "Slice of Life"/Family novelist whose work contains situations no less fictional than King's or Christie's murders. Why are you choosing to see it as something that it isn't? Is it because you get aroused by tickling? That is not my fault. If a sociopath gets aroused by vivid, detailed descriptions of murder and death, does that make Steven King a Death Fetishist? Does that make his work Death Fetish Art? Of course not.
An objective observer would note that there are absolutely no mainstream sexual elements in my stories; none whatsoever. The deviance of the reader does not reflect on the artist's work. In fact, it's a sign of good writing when a reader projects some elements of himself into a story. That makes it a good story. While you're desperate to paint my stories as sexual, you are just admitting your own over-the-top sexuality. I know for a fact that there are people who get sexually aroused by Dr. Seuss and Mother Goose stories. Those still remain children's stories despite the deviance of a few readers.
Accept your own deviance; don't try to project it onto me because you will fail.
You were right that not all things ARE fetishistic, but it's the fact that they CAN be fetishistic, and there's nothing you can do to avoid that because you're posting your work on deviantart, and deviantart has a strong fetish community. im 100% aware that a tickling fetish isn't mainstream, and i didn't say it was, but look where you're posting your stories, i mean, come on. But obviously you are the writer of your stories, so you know what you're putting in there, you're aware of the genre, you're not trying to fool anyone or throw in subliminal. but here's the rule of thumb for ANYTHING IN EXISTENCE: if it exists, there's porn for it. Haha, that's a popular 4chan rule. This isn't 4chan, but you get my point. Just because someone finds sexuality in something that isn't there, that doesn't mean you need to correct them. Like we both said, SOME people probably find sexuality in stephen king books and such, and i'm sure King is totally aware of that, but I've never heard him tell anyone who thought that "you're wrong, it's not sexual, if you think so you're a minority and a freak". If you plan on becoming a novelist, you really need to open your eyes. I don't want you to take this offensively because I'm not trying to tell you your stories are freaky and you need to change them or that your ENTIRE fanbase is based on fetishism. If your stories weren't structured well, I wouldn't even be reading them. Just try to keep an open mind. If someone likes your story for something it wasn't made for, then oh well, say Thanks and move on. If someone tries to pin you down as a fetish novelist and that bugs you, then ignore them and don't give them the satisfaction of making a journal post about them.
I'm not against you here, just try to be a bit more accepting. That's all. Cheers.
So be careful of whom you say is being hateful, and search your own soul if you think you're seeing it in an emotionally-neutral statement.